I like these, but instead of the [limited Relative Priority] idea, I would list the relevant WCAG checkpoints with a note that the rest are not applicable. Chaals On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Jan Richards wrote: More rewrites. For 3.1 and 3.2, these include special notes that hopefully do a better job of limiting the scope of the relative priority checkpoints: [snip]Received on Monday, 2 July 2001 01:01:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:00 GMT