Re: Checkpoints for Guideline 3

• From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
• Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 01:01:38 -0400 (EDT)
• To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
• cc: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107020100150.4778-100000@tux.w3.org>

I like these, but instead of the [limited Relative Priority] idea, I would
list the relevant WCAG checkpoints with a note that the rest are not
applicable.

Chaals

On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Jan Richards wrote:

  More rewrites. For 3.1 and 3.2, these include special notes that
  hopefully do a better job of limiting the scope of the relative priority
  checkpoints:


[snip]

Received on Monday, 2 July 2001 01:01:39 UTC