W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 2000

RE: consistency of techniques with new definition

From: Heather Swayne <hswayne@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 19:40:46 -0700
Message-ID: <3C3175FCC945D211B65100805F1580890D3D242E@RED-MSG-07>
To: "'Jutta Treviranus'" <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>, w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Section 3.3.1, within Techniques for Using Prompting, uses the software
definition of prompt.  I think this is acceptable, but it might be helpful
to specifically call this out.

I believe section 3.4 can be removed or combined with section 3.3.  Our
current definition of prompt is a mixture of the software definition of
prompt and alert.  By having these examples in a section entitled alerts it
implies that these examples would not comply with the authoring tools 3.1
recommendation.

Heather Swayne

-----Original Message-----
From: Jutta Treviranus [mailto:jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 11:53 AM
To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Subject: consistency of techniques with new definition

Could people please review the techniques in the document to assess
whether they are consistent with the new definition. This will be
discussed in the next teleconference.

Jutta
Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2000 22:41:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:44 UTC