W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Prompting Techniques Appendix

From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:37:22 -0400
Message-ID: <38EB87E2.4EE76A7E@utoronto.ca>
To: Marjolein Katsma <access@javawoman.com>
CC: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Thanks for the quick reply.

There is not much I can do about your first point.  I just attached all
six files and that's how it came out.

In response to your second point, you are right probably right.  The
process of looking at a dialog is more of a hassle than dragging and
dropping but "intrusive" may be the wrong word.

Cheers,
Jan

Marjolein Katsma wrote:
> 
> Although I did no more than a quick scan of the text yet, I have two comments:
> 
> 1. I have some trouble deciding which image goes where (images show up as attachments, the text doesn't - so maybe that is the problem)
> 
> 2. In - 4. Types of Prompting, Prompts -
> 
> you state:
> 
> [HomeSite example] "Although the dialog itself is in some sense intrusive, the inclusion of the Alt. Text field, once the dialog is displayed, would not be considered intrusive."
> But I don't see how the tag editing dialogs can ever be "intrusive": the user has many ways to enter or edit each tag (including just typing the code), and a tag editing dialog is only ever displayed at the user's specific request.
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2000 14:37:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:44 UTC