- From: <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:42:41 -0600
- To: w3C-wai-au@w3.org
CMN: >In other words, are you arguing that the ambiguity in the present wording is >going to be beneficial to developers who are thinking about how to implement? No, not at all. I want them to do both! Not all plumbing as a UI. And not all UI requires additional plumbing. So by "not limiting" the requirement to UI, or in other words, not inserting the phrase "user interface:, it implies both the UI and the plumbing are required. Regards, Phill Jenkins,
Received on Wednesday, 15 December 1999 10:51:48 UTC