Another thing I forgot :-( The checklists now have text explaining that they refer to WCAG, and can be met at three different priority levels. (THe table version doesn't make a space for that yet) I ahve not updated the issues list to reflect yesterday's meeting - that will have to wait until thursday. Charles On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: Which is half the work. And not the point. I forgot to mention that I have added references to ERT, the XML draft guidelines, accessibility notes, etc to 4.1 techniques as pointers for now. Cheers Charles On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Ian Jacobs wrote: Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > Dear all, > > thanks to Ian That's misleading. Charles did the work. I tweaked the publication. - Ian --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell Street, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia (I've moved!) --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell Street, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia (I've moved!)Received on Wednesday, 8 December 1999 10:36:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:52:56 GMT