W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: meeting, Proposed Recommendation status

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 16:41:05 -0400 (EDT)
To: pjenkins@us.ibm.com
cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910191635500.3789-100000@tux.w3.org>
4.2 (now 4.3) was resolved again last week as relative priority, although it
was acknowledged that we needed to ask you about it.

6.3 was resolved to have priority 3 at the meeting last week, since it had
not been formally resolved during the face to face.


5.1 was changed to P2 at teh meeting on 8 September, and formalised at the
face to face.

5.2 was lowered to P2 at the face to face, with Gregory and I dissenting
(wanting it to remain P1)

The priority of 4.3 is on the agenda as one of the two substantive issues for
tomorrow (although I am having trouble with the server, so I don't think I
have managed to save the updated agenda.


On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 pjenkins@us.ibm.com wrote:

  Priorities, is still an issue that hasn't been completely resolved from our face
  to face.
  At least we need to refer to 4.2
  5.2, http://www.w3.org/WAI/AI/f2f3-minutes1.html#priority1
  all of GL 6, http://www.w3.org/WAI/AI/f2f3-minutes1.html#Priority1
  Phill Jenkins,  1-512-838-4517
  Accessibility Program Manager,  Senior Software Engineer

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 1999 16:43:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:43 UTC