Re: meeting, Proposed Recommendation status

4.2 (now 4.3) was resolved again last week as relative priority, although it
was acknowledged that we needed to ask you about it.

6.3 was resolved to have priority 3 at the meeting last week, since it had
not been formally resolved during the face to face.

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/telecon-13oct99#results

5.1 was changed to P2 at teh meeting on 8 September, and formalised at the
face to face.

5.2 was lowered to P2 at the face to face, with Gregory and I dissenting
(wanting it to remain P1)

The priority of 4.3 is on the agenda as one of the two substantive issues for
tomorrow (although I am having trouble with the server, so I don't think I
have managed to save the updated agenda.

Charles

On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 pjenkins@us.ibm.com wrote:

  
  
  Priorities, is still an issue that hasn't been completely resolved from our face
  to face.
  
  At least we need to refer to 4.2
  http://www.w3.org/WAI/AI/f2f3-minutes1.html#priority
  5.2, http://www.w3.org/WAI/AI/f2f3-minutes1.html#priority1
  all of GL 6, http://www.w3.org/WAI/AI/f2f3-minutes1.html#Priority1
  
  Regards,
  Phill Jenkins,  1-512-838-4517
  Accessibility Program Manager,  Senior Software Engineer
  
  

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA

Received on Tuesday, 19 October 1999 16:43:56 UTC