W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: acronyms

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 21:56:47 -0400 (EDT)
To: thatch@us.ibm.com
cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908162155210.1802-100000@tux.w3.org>
I grant that acronym expansion is less critical than many other features, and
would happily exchange the example for another - so unless usggestions are
forthcoming, I'll put my mind to finding another.

And yes, the wording is rather circular isn't it. Better work on that too.

Charles McCN

On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 thatch@us.ibm.com wrote:

  Please, Charles,  tell me why -
  Generating accessibility content, including ... expansion for acronyms... is
  one of the most fundamental requirements of accessible content.
  I believe acronym expansion is irrelevant for access.
  Also the wording is strange, "generating AC ... is one of the most fundamental
  requirements of AC!!!"
  Jim Thatcher
  IBM Special Needs Systems

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Monday, 16 August 1999 21:56:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:43 UTC