- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 18:03:47 -0800
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: Bruce Roberts/CAM/Lotus <Bruce_Roberts/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com>, w3c-wai-au@w3.org
At 06:41 p.m. 03/23/99 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >It is my opinion (as expressed in the teleconference on 9 february) is >that we should open the pandora's box [...] Just so I can get told a definitive "no" on this one, I assume it is too late to change the deliverable schedules so that we produce TWO documents, one on accessibility of generated content, and one on accessibility of the tool itself? It seems to me that we have, in effect, two things here, and perhaps it would be better if we DID treat them as two things, so we can finish the first (or second), get it out there into circulation so it can be used by tool manufacturers to increase accessibility, and then spend whatever time we need hammering out the second (or first) document? Okay, go ahead and tell me "no, that's a dumb idea". :) -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@hwg.org> President, Governing Board Member HTML Writers Guild <URL:http://www.hwg.org>
Received on Friday, 26 March 1999 21:07:33 UTC