Currently the definition is 'as specified in the Page Author Guidelines'. (section something or other) I think that is correct in spirit. Although PAGL is still a WD it has become fairly stable, and will almost certainly be a recommendation by the time we settle this document. As a proposal, I suggest we make the follwing definition: Accessible markup Markup which conforms to the W3C Page Author Guidelines [ref] charles On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Charles (Chuck) Oppermann wrote: What is "accessible markup"? It needs to be spelled out. For example, is <ABBR> accessible markup? A list of immutable tags and attributes should be provided.Received on Tuesday, 5 January 1999 12:38:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:52:54 GMT