- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 18:57:17 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- cc: WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > I propose that we add the following text after the goals: > > The priority of a checkpoint is a reflection of how important it is to > meeting those goals. > which I still think is a good idea, and also > and the following after the definitions themselves: > > It should be noted that meeting the checkpoint does not guarantee that the > goals will be met. In particular, if an author is trying to create > inaccessible content a tool cannot necessarily prevent them from doing so. It > is assumed that the user would prefer to create content which is accessible. and ian said: I thought about similar text for conformance in WCAG. It was shot down. I don't think it's necessary here. I am happy to lose the second piece. But I think the first link sentence makes it easier to read what is going on. Charles
Received on Thursday, 17 June 1999 18:57:20 UTC