Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > I propose that we add the following text after the goals: > > The priority of a checkpoint is a reflection of how important it is to > meeting those goals. > which I still think is a good idea, and also > and the following after the definitions themselves: > > It should be noted that meeting the checkpoint does not guarantee that the > goals will be met. In particular, if an author is trying to create > inaccessible content a tool cannot necessarily prevent them from doing so. It > is assumed that the user would prefer to create content which is accessible. and ian said: I thought about similar text for conformance in WCAG. It was shot down. I don't think it's necessary here. I am happy to lose the second piece. But I think the first link sentence makes it easier to read what is going on. CharlesReceived on Thursday, 17 June 1999 18:57:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:52:55 GMT