W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: 2.1.4 - identifying by text equivalent

From: <Bruce_Roberts/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 16:00:46 -0400
To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Message-ID: <8525677C.006E23F4.00@mta2.lotus.com>
I agree with Charles that my re-wording is not needed as a checkpoint.  I'd
rather see it in the techniques for 2.1.1.

-- Bruce

Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>@w3.org on 05/25/99 02:25:13 PM

Sent by:  w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org

To:   WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>

Subject:  2.1.4 - identifying by text equivalent

Bruce Roberts proposed a wording change some time ago which nicely captured
the meaning of the checkpoint:

allow the author to identify all document elements that are editable or that
wil affect the output.

I think the checkpoint is not necessary, but if we want it we should adopt
Bruce's wording...


--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 1999 15:54:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:42 UTC