W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: Merging sections 2 and 3

From: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 12:30:18 -0400
Message-Id: <v04011709b35b681d0a07@[142.150.64.191]>
To: love26@gorge.net, au <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
I have no objection to a single guidelines section with an A and B subsection.

Jutta

At 6:58 AM -0700 5/10/99, William Loughborough wrote:
>JT:: "...both guideline 2 and 3 are ultimately for everyone."
>
>WL: See how easy it is?  You've just merged *Sections* 2 & 3 by making
>them *guidelines* <g>.  The contents of Sections 2 & 3 are *just*
>guidelines and the differentiation along lines of whether they refer to
>the interface or the output are entirely specious. Because we arrived at
>the notion of separating them into "sections" on a particular basis
>doesn't mean that such a division has any useful purpose - and many of
>us feel that it is just a (very subtle?) form of ghettoization.  I still
>vote for merger.
>--
>Love.
>            ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
>http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Monday, 10 May 1999 12:28:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:42 UTC