W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: Weighing in on priority definitions

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 08:42:45 -0700
Message-ID: <37272C75.C71C1753@gorge.net>
To: au <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Jutta's proposal for priority wording has my approval FWIW.  I might
leave out the "with disabilities" in the interest of the notion of
universal design.

It is quite possible that: all authors have some "disability"; all
authors find some difficult-to-impossible reaction to any of the
prioritized checkpoints.

-- 
Love.
            ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 1999 11:42:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:42 UTC