At the end of the telecon I mentioned some misgivings about the dual use of the word "content": the content of the file (with markup); the content in the sense of "separate content from presentation" imperative. One of the main purposes of the WAI "movement" is to join the CSSers and other rational folk in an attempt (hopefuly not foolishly vain) to get authors to keep "content" (meaning, import?) distinct from presentation. Many authors find this incomprehensible since to them form is an inseparable part of function - there is no non-semantic content, even the color of the <HR>s carries a message. I don't have a clue as to what to do about any of this but in the interest of a bow to political correctness, I think we might find a word for "markup content" that is different from "idea content". Or not! -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE http://dicomp.pair.comReceived on Thursday, 22 April 1999 10:09:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:52:54 GMT