At 14:10 02/02/12 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote: >It looks like you have digged up an interesting problem. >I'm copying the HTML WG (because it's them who have to issue an >erratum if we need one), the I18N IG, and the bidi list of the >Unicode consortium (because there also seem to be differences >with respect to the bidi algorithm). It looks like I have made a serious mistake in including the wrong list for this discussion. w3c-translators@w3.org, please ignore the postings in this thread and accept my apology. Regards, Martin.Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2002 07:03:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:39:47 GMT