[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
Terry Allen <tallen@sonic.net> wrote:
> you need to step back and define an overall architecture for pointing
> at everything you might want to point at, packaging it together, and
> delivering it without ambiguity (avoiding the Panorama disease).
We prefer not to refer to Panorama as a disease, actually.
I think this is a little excessive.
> http://www.wco.com/~books/draft.5feb97.txt
If that proposal were used for HTML, browsers like Netscape and Opera would
be noticably slower. I don't think anything that is demonstrably worse
than current practice should be adopted, although it may be considered
where it has merit.
The SGML Open multipart-related draft was done so that SGML could be
exchanged by e-mail. It doesn't work well for the web because it
precludes (or considerably conplicates) parallel fetching.
For example, once I have seen the start of an XML document, up to the
end of the DOCTYPE section, I know whether I have to fetch a DTD, and,
if so, how. So I might as well start fetching it immediately without
waiting for the rest of the document. Same for style sheets (I hope).
Since XML now has PUBLIC Identifiers, I will want to do my DNS queries
on those (the resolution method I've chosen [1]) as soon as possible, since
it can take several seconds. So I want to get references to all included
files as soon as possible.
Hence, I want to get, in this order:
* the start of the document
* all external DTD fragments
* URLs of any included images, so I can start fetching them
* the text of the document
With HTTP NG, this can all be done over a single HTTP connection, if
everything comes from the same server. With HTTP 1.1, I can fetch
multiple things in sequence cheaply, so I can keep just a few connections
and multiplex over them myself if I want in my client.
None of this is to say that Terry's Unoptimized SGML-Bundle Relations Schema
does not have merit for other uses, by the way, than for interactive Internet
delivery of SGML.
Lee