Re: A serious detail point
In message <email@example.com> "Henry S. Thompson" writes:
> I think Peter's criticism was similar, if I understood it. I accept
in the sense of comment, rather than confrontation :-)
> this as a knock-down rebuttal. Sigh.
Not at all! Most of the suggestions on this list won't get adopted. I see
them as needing to find the right evolutionary niche where they may flourish.
They may well be appropriate in another context at another time.
Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection
Virtual School of Molecular Sciences