Re: A serious detail point
I am sympathetic to Henry's problem as I also encounter something very
similar (possibly for different reasons). Henry's motivation sounds like
the annotation of a document (e.g. Shakespeare) while mine is the provision
of links from a document to a glossary. I had also come up with the
entity mechanism as the simplest and (hopefully elegant) mechanism and
(because my glossaries are usually small files under a common root) decided I
would need a caching mechanism.
In message <email@example.com> "Henry S. Thompson" writes:
> Some of you may have heard my talk(s) at WWW6 about standoff markup.
> They seemed to strike a chord with a number of folk. I'll be doing a
> similar talk at SGML Europe next month. I use XML-LINK in these
> talks, but it's actually bogus, and I (arrogantly? No, I think there's
Is this because you cannot accurately address the target document (i.e. spans)?
Otherwise it seems possible using the existing syntax as below:
in commentary.xml (targetting Jon's markup):
<NOTE XML-LINK="SIMPLE" CONTEXT="http://some/where/i/forget/macbeth.sgm"
HREF="#DESCENDANT(4,ACT)(1,SCENE)(1,LINE)" TITLE="Simple recipes"/>
<!-- 20 more notes -->
<NOTE XML-LINK="SIMPLE" HREF="#DESCENDANT(5,ACT)(1,SCENE)(1,LINE)"
TITLE="Care of Trees"/>
However, if the initial document (the link container) is likely to change,
so is the context of any XML-LINK. (In my hands, this would be a recipe for
disaster.) It would be similar if *part* of the link container were abstracted
(e.g. via TEI Xptrs) so that the context were again lost.
For example I could search for
which returns a well-formed fragment which the reader might assume contained
valid HREFs, but no longer does. In the latter context it could be possible
for an XML-LINK processor to add the CONTEXT info during initial traversal,
but it would be easy to foul up.
Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection
Virtual School of Molecular Sciences