Re: Comments on 31 March spec from Gavin Nicol on 1997-04-09 (w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org from April 1997)

From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@eps.inso.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 11:35:49 -0400
To: U35395@UICVM.UIC.EDU
CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <199704091535.LAA26943@nathaniel.ebt>

>If there is any version of the two standards more recent than
>ISO 10646:1993 / Unicode 1.1 in which the two are technically
>identical, my first instinct would be to specify those versions.

At the recent Unicode conference in Mainz, one speaker from ISO
went to great lengths to explain that as Unicode 2.0 and ISO 10646
are compatibile.

Received on Wednesday, 9 April 1997 11:37:14 UTC