[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Comments on 31 March spec



>If there is any version of the two standards more recent than
>ISO 10646:1993 / Unicode 1.1 in which the two are technically
>identical, my first instinct would be to specify those versions.

At the recent Unicode conference in Mainz, one speaker from ISO
went to great lengths to explain that as Unicode 2.0 and ISO 10646
are compatibile.


References: