Re: The furore over PUBLIC
> Would this, then, be an infinitely recursable problem? If the entity
> refers to the document itself, which contains an entity that refers to
> the document itself, which contains....
Only if you tried to include it, I guess.
> >If you put a really bogus system identifier in, then you
> >have an incorrect XML document, which is probably what you want in
> >practice, but at least the XML spec does not "condone" such a thing.
> Is this a check of well-formedness?
If an XML document is defined to be a document with URLs in particular
places things that do not have URLs in those places are just not XML
documents. That means that they are neither well-formed nor valid XML