RE: The furore over PUBLIC

>From: 	Paul Prescod[SMTP:papresco@csclub.uwaterloo.ca]
>Sent: 	Tuesday, April 01, 1997 11:47
>To: 	Ken Holman
>Cc: 	w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
>Subject: 	Re: The furore over PUBLIC
>> I gather from draft 961114 that the behaviour of an XML system regarding
>> malformed or unresolvable URLs is not specified ... so I figure it is up
>> to the implementation.
>That is just a relative URL to the document base URL. So its meaning is
>well defined. 

Would this, then, be an infinitely recursable problem?  If the entity
refers to the document itself, which contains an entity that refers to
the document itself, which contains....

>If you put a really bogus system identifier in, then you
>have an incorrect XML document, which is probably what you want in 
>practice, but at least the XML spec does not "condone" such a thing.

Is this a check of well-formedness?

....... Ken

G. Ken Holman       mailto:gkholman@microstar.com
Chief Technology Officer  Microstar Software Ltd.
http://www.microstar.com      +1(613)596-2233x317
3775 Richmond Rd., Nepean, Ontario CANADA K2H-5B7
Personal:   Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0
mailto:gkholman@CanadaMail.com    +1(613)489-2987
PGP:   http://www.cyberus.ca/~holman/gkholman.pgp