RE: The furore over PUBLIC
While I could support this proposal, please bear with me while I make
>From: Peter Flynn[SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org]
>Sent: Saturday, March 29, 1997 19:47
>Subject: Re: The furore over PUBLIC
>Is it too much to propose that an identifier must be
>either SYSTEM "url"
>or PUBLIC "fpi" "url"
I gather from draft 961114 that the behaviour of an XML system regarding
malformed or unresolvable URLs is not specified ... so I figure it is up
to the implementation.
Production  allows the following to be specified in production :
So what does a conforming XML processor do when it sees this empty
string as the ExternalID's SystemLiteral?
The way I will encode my documents in accordance with the above proposal
is to use:
PUBLIC "-//my public id//EN" ""
Which I am willing to accept will only be resolvable by XML processors
supporting resolution ... it is my choice to encode my document this
Is it really so much to ask that I be allowed to use the following
PUBLIC "-//my public id//EN"