Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]

Let me say it another way.  User agents should not be required to
support catalogues *or any other mechanism specified by XML*
to resolve public identifiers.  There should be *no default
assumed* by publishers.  That's hard to swallow, and most of 
this group is choking on it; ask yourselves whether you need
a specified default mechanism to find a copy of Moby Dick;
ask yourselves whether, had Melville's publisher specified a
default mechanism (e.g., writing to the publisher's address),
you should have to follow it today.

Regards, Terry

From w3c-sgml-wg-request@w3.org Sat Mar 29 14:48:42 1997
Received: from www19.w3.org (www19.w3.org []) by sub.sonic.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA15790 for <tallen@sonic.net>; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 14:48:41 -0800
Received: by www19.w3.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id RAA27522; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 17:44:24 -0500
Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 17:44:24 -0500
Resent-Message-Id: <199703292244.RAA27522@www19.w3.org>
Message-ID: <333D9AC5.5A80@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 17:42:13 -0500
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b2 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <199703292133.NAA16289@bolt.sonic.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-List-URL: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Archives/Public/w3c-sgml-wg/
X-See-Also: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/SGML/Activity
Resent-From: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/3839
X-Loop: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Sender: w3c-sgml-wg-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: w3c-sgml-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
Status: R

Terry Allen wrote:
> I am unwilling to specify any default resolution mechanism
> for PUBLIC identifiers.  This should be at the discretion of
> the user agent.  

Default means "at the discretion of the user agent, as long as they
support at least *this*." There is no dichtomy between default and

> (And by resolution I mean what Peter does,
> figuring out the indirection and obtaining the item.)  One
> can say that a catalogue is the publisher's advice on how
> to resolve his PIs, but the client should not be restricted
> to that method.  

If we meant that the client should be restricted, we would not use the
word "default", we would use the word "exclusive."

 Paul Prescod