Re: Two more points for cleanup in existing draft

At 12:00 21/03/97 +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>unsatisfactory.  '[P]arsed character data' is misleading, since by the
>syntax PCData cannot contain references!  

I've been campaigning for years for the phrase "parsable character data",
ie char data which it makes sense to parse (because it may contain markup)
as opposed to CDATA which there is no point in parsing because it can't.