[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]



At 2:04 AM +0000 3/27/97, Peter Flynn wrote:
>At 16:54 26/03/97 -0800, Terry wrote:
>>it's not clear to me that the SGML ERB would settle for PUBLIC=URN
>>rather than PUBLIC=public-per-8879.
>
>I don't see any advantage. The latter already works: URN's aren't in
>use yet.

   And even when they come into use (over the next few months, I hope), we
won't be able to use them with XML, which currently has no way to support
location- or resolution mechanism-independent naming.

  -- David

_________________________________________
David Durand              dgd@cs.bu.edu  \  david@dynamicDiagrams.com
Boston University Computer Science        \  Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/   \  Dynamic Diagrams
--------------------------------------------\  http://dynamicDiagrams.com/
MAPA: mapping for the WWW                    \__________________________



References: