[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

ERB reporting group



At 06:58 PM 3/16/97 -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
>1. Contrary to our decision of last time, we will support subelement
>   addressing by a simple search operator.  We will make it clear that
>   bit-for-bit matching without respect to words or tokens is compliant
>   behavior; if implementations wish to compete on the basis of 
>   case-folding or other fancy search optimization, that's fine.

Oops.  I am reminded that we never got around to voting on that one,
and that it's not a done deal.  Slap the court reporter's wrists. - Tim