- From: Dave Hollander <dmh@hpsgml.fc.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 18:01:42 -0700
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
> >4.1.a Should we have a single attribute > >4.1.b If so, what should the attribute be called? > >4.1.c If not, should we use a different attribute for each type > >4.1.d If using different attributes for locator languages > >4.1.e Should we discard this scheme and adopt something > >4.1.f Should we abandon the idea of different address types and assert that > >everything is a URL? 4.1.f. I am looking for mine, too. > <asbestos-undies>do SGML IDREFs really need to be subsumed into XML Link? I would be happy if it would work out that URL#IDREF is valid for XML. <eyes closed> I do not see any reason it shouldn't > Ooh, I'm gonna get scorched.</asbestos-undies> -T. Every one in the frying-pan! Dave
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 1997 20:10:06 UTC