Re: 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links

At 13:06 4/3/97 -0500, David Durand wrote:

>This seems to complicate the model, and isn't necessary if we have an
>equivalent of BASE or LOCSRC. I would leave this out as being purely a
>convenience feature unless we don't have an equivalent way to specify an
>alternative addressing origin (or LOCSRC or base address or whatever you
>want to call it)

I thought LOCSRC had been dropped, which is partly why I suggested the
alternative based on nesting. If locrsrc is there you don't need this
concept of redirecting fragment references, though the labelling of groups
of tags is still important.
Martin Bryan, The SGML Centre, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK 
Phone/Fax: +44 1452 714029   WWW home page: http://www.sgml.u-net.com/