[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link



At 11:07 AM 2/24/97 -0500, Sam Hunting wrote:
>> >Why not just "xlink"? 
> As Jon points out, it needs to begin with "XML-"

Irrelevant; xlink still works.  It's going to have to be XML-something;
the spec currently uses XML-MLINK, and in the prose we say multilink.
So it could be XML-XLINK and "extended link".  I still like it. -T.


Follow-Ups: