At 11:07 AM 2/24/97 -0500, Sam Hunting wrote: >> >Why not just "xlink"? > As Jon points out, it needs to begin with "XML-" Irrelevant; xlink still works. It's going to have to be XML-something; the spec currently uses XML-MLINK, and in the prose we say multilink. So it could be XML-XLINK and "extended link". I still like it. -T.