Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation
Peter Flynn wrote:
> Len writes:
> > > Is it time to point to our activity statement again?
> > >
> > > http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/SGML/Activity
> > Sure, but in preparing the FAQ, public announcements,
> > pleas for shareware, the gotchas should be pointed out.
> Yes please...if anyone spots pet gotchas for the FAQ, I'd
> be grateful for them. v.3 should be out this weekend at
Just quickly glancing, XML isn't an "application of SGML".
I think it is a proper subset. HTML is an application of
SGML, and could be an application of XML. That is, perhaps,
one way to get the point across.