Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation

| > I aggree. But I *do* wish we could stop referring to SGML files as
| > "legacy".  Surely SGML->XML is a "down-translation" not an
| > "up-translation".
| And the language in fact obscures what the most likely application 
| of XML is:  a delivery format on the Web for SGML.

Which is (surprise!) what we're trying to do here.

Is it time to point to our activity statement again?



Follow-Ups: References: