Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation
| > I aggree. But I *do* wish we could stop referring to SGML files as
| > "legacy". Surely SGML->XML is a "down-translation" not an
| > "up-translation".
| And the language in fact obscures what the most likely application
| of XML is: a delivery format on the Web for SGML.
Which is (surprise!) what we're trying to do here.
Is it time to point to our activity statement again?