Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation
Digitome Ltd. wrote:
> >I concur completely with Michael.
> >No-one has ever said that existing legacy SGML (or HTML) files will be
> >valid XML files. They won't.
> I aggree. But I *do* wish we could stop referring to SGML files as "legacy".
> Surely SGML->XML is a "down-translation" not an "up-translation".
And the language in fact obscures what the most likely application
of XML is: a delivery format on the Web for SGML.