[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation



>I concur completely with Michael.
>
>No-one has ever said that existing legacy SGML (or HTML) files will be
>valid XML files.  They won't.

I aggree. But I *do* wish we could stop referring to SGML files as "legacy".
Surely SGML->XML is a "down-translation" not an "up-translation".

Sean



Follow-Ups: