Re: There Are No Metadocuments

At 10:04 AM 2/11/97, Gavin Nicol wrote:
>It's just a matter of interpretation. Code is data is code.
>Java bytecodes are nothing more than a processing specification
>until they are interpreted, and there are a number of ways *that*
>can be done as well...

>As soon as you start defining objects that have some behavioural
>semantics associated with them, you also open up the possibility
>of people interpreting the semantics.
True, but essentially false:

   Once the interpretation of the data is a turing-complete problem, the
possibility of _useful_ interpretation goes way, way down.

   Those unfortunates who stored data in hypercard scripts discovered that
the hard way -- of course they're fine for the ages --- If you happen to
have a hypercard interpreter in your pocket, along with a clone of the

  -- David

This is why I mistrust jumping to code _too soon_. To push the interaction
envelope you need code, but you also lose reusability, because your
environment sneaks into your data... We definitely will need to attach code
to documents though.

David Durand              dgd@cs.bu.edu  \  david@dynamicDiagrams.com
Boston University Computer Science        \  Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/   \  Dynamic Diagrams
--------------------------------------------\  http://dynamicDiagrams.com/
MAPA: mapping for the WWW                    \__________________________