Re: XML catalog draft

Gavin wrote:
> OK. I agree that SO catalogs would be somewhat stretched by this. I think
> we might then go off and define the "packing list" and "meta-document"
> seperately. For simple cases, SO catalogs would be good enough, and
> for everything else, meta-documents.
> Perhaps the WG shoudl produce a spec for both?

Yes.  I'd be happy with this.  This is what I am calling "layered" standards. 

R. Alexander Milowski     http://www.copsol.com/   alex@copsol.com
Copernican Solutions Incorporated                  (612) 379 - 3608