Re: XML catalog draft
> OK. I agree that SO catalogs would be somewhat stretched by this. I think
> we might then go off and define the "packing list" and "meta-document"
> seperately. For simple cases, SO catalogs would be good enough, and
> for everything else, meta-documents.
> Perhaps the WG shoudl produce a spec for both?
Yes. I'd be happy with this. This is what I am calling "layered" standards.
R. Alexander Milowski http://www.copsol.com/ email@example.com
Copernican Solutions Incorporated (612) 379 - 3608