Re: 1.3, Notation: SGML? Reference Concrete?

>>1.3.b If links are SGML elements, should require XML-style reference
>>concrete syntax + quoted attribute values?  I.e. assert that
>>all links would fit into XML docs?
>I want this to be usable with real SGML.  So I think we should *not*
>restrict them to XML-style syntax, but insert a usage note saying it
>won't work with XML unless you follow XML rules. - Tim

I think I concur on this. Though the more strongly we can encourage people
to use XML, the better.