[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: 1.4 h: Explainer?



At 4:49 PM 2/7/97, Jon Bosak wrote:
>I don't like "explainer" either (there seems to be a consensus
>building on the dislike, anyway), but "caption" is too
>presentationally specific; you wouldn't want to call this a caption if
>it were an item in a menu list, for example.  I would suggest "label"
>(that is, more formally, "link label").

I like "explainer", actually, but then I learned it in high school when
using an experimental Hypertext system at Brown -- so it's been in my
vocabulary for a long time.


I don't like the terms description or caption in any permutations or
variations because they imply formatting semantics.

  -- David

I am not a number. I am an undefined character.
_________________________________________
David Durand              dgd@cs.bu.edu  \  david@dynamicDiagrams.com
Boston University Computer Science        \  Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/   \  Dynamic Diagrams
--------------------------------------------\  http://dynamicDiagrams.com/
MAPA: mapping for the WWW                    \__________________________