Re: 1.4 h: Explainer?
Liora Alschuler wrote:
> 1.4.h Does "explainer" make anyone else uncomfortable?
Yes. Sounds like Howard Cosell.
> I added this question, at risk of bringing up something on which there is
> already concensus, because I can find no reason not to call a caption a
> This is a link caption so call it a "link caption" or if there are reasons
> not to use caption, then some of the other common words already used to
> describe what it does: "link title" or "link subtitle"
VRML uses Description. Caption is better than explainer.