Re: 1.4 h: Explainer?

Liora Alschuler wrote:
> 1.4.h Does "explainer" make anyone else uncomfortable?

Yes.  Sounds like Howard Cosell.

> I added this question, at risk of bringing up something on which there is
> already concensus, because I can find no reason not to call a caption a
> "caption".
> This is a link caption so call it a "link caption" or if there are reasons
> not to use caption, then some of the other common words already used to
> describe what it does: "link title" or "link subtitle"

VRML uses Description.   Caption is better than explainer.


Follow-Ups: References: