- From: Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 15:25:55 -0600
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Tim Bray wrote: > > At 03:27 PM 2/4/97 -0500, Eve L. Maler wrote: > >I like Hyper-XML -- a lot! -- as the short name, and Hypertext Enabled XML > >as the long name. In fact, for the short version, HyperXML spelled solid, > >without the hyphen, looks even better. > > HyperXML is nice. I didn't like Sean's Hyper-X, because that collides > with Hyper-G. Yes. I predcit they will quickly call it HyperX in practice, but that's not important. > I take it that nobody else considers it important to advertise the fact > that this technology is *not* limited to XML applications? - Tim Is this something like the HyTime claim that it is not limited to SGML? len
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 1997 16:36:55 UTC