[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: 1.4.g: define/discuss Traversal?



| I'm beginning to think we should leave this out.  In the spec, we
| wrote "traverse" means "use".  If we believe this, why don't we just
| say "use"?  Unless we are going to be forced to specify some
| behaviors; in which case a specific term like traversal is probably
| called for. - Tim

I'm the token minimalist on this subject, but in the case of
"traverse" I think we should take advantage of the existence of a term
that precisely describes what we mean and isn't already grossly
overloaded.

Jon


References: