- From: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 17:40:38 -0800
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
- CC: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM
| It dawned on me that since I co-drafted the spec, I ought to have the | courtesy to put in a pitch for the status quo on all these section 1 | items. And I should, pro forma, repeat my disagreement. | At 11:08 AM 31/01/97 -0800, Tim Bray wrote: | >0.1 What should the title of the spec be? | >0.2 What should the generic term or acronym we use to reference whatever | > it is the spec describes? | | (a) I don't think that XML-Link is euphonious or memorable, and | (b) XML is not exactly a name to conjure with (yet), and | (c) It is *important* that what we build operate with, and be advised as | operating with, SGML and HTML. I think that we should emphasize the association between components of a suite of specifications. I also personally find "XHL" a really unpleasant acronym (I can't say why, I just don't like it). Jon
Received on Monday, 3 February 1997 20:41:02 UTC