Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It?
>1.c: Should we exclude relationships such as containment and
>succession from this spec?
No - We need concept like PARENT, CHILD, HERE and ROOT to make querying into
documents that do not have any IDs or otherwised named anchor (or whatever
they are called) points.
>1.d Should we specify a way for a document to provide a summary of
>the linkage machinery it uses?
If we can have a way of identifying the notation used for link definition,
with ideally that notation pointing to the address of a Java class that can
be used to implement the relevant notation, then we might be able make it
possible for blind browsers to process newly invented notations.
Martin Bryan, The SGML Centre, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK
Phone/Fax: +44 1452 714029 WWW home page: http://www.u-net.com/~sgml/