Re: Anchor terminology
> For a reference/referent/target/comefrom/landing zone,
> I still prefer "active region" or a "zone".
> A link end can be a target, but it can also be where the
> archer places his feet, both the golf tee and the hole, sometimes
> both at once.
> For an annotation, for example, it's not really a target,
> but just a region of interest.
Whatever. I'll check in from time to time to see
how the baby is named. I really suggest we
stick with something they understand already.
I was cheerful with ilink and clink since we've
been tossing these around for quite a while now.
Ok, let's obsolete all the books so we can
all write new ones. I'm sure
Steve and David are happy to do YetAnotherUpdate
to Making Hypermedia Work. :-)