Re: Anchor terminology

David Durand wrote:

>         Even though "referents" sounds exactly like "reference"?
>         Jon

> a very good point. I was thinking that pointer referent is clear, but
> the plural is confusing. Maybe target is better after all. Link-end
> works for me, but I don't think of ropes, since links are now part of
> my primary ontology.
>     Just so long as it's not anchor!