At 03:09 PM 1/27/97 EST, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: >If it is something that could also be used with HTML (say, at least >in principle) Yes, and SGML in general, too. Let's not forget that. XML-LINK is (yawn) boring. I thought XHL sounded enough like XML that it was obvious that they were in the same family; and was contemplating having XDL or XFL or something for phase 3. Oh well. -T.