[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: something completely different



At 11:37 AM 1/24/97, Lou Burnard wrote:
>Is there a better place such enquiries should be referred to? Is the XML Q&A
>document or an expansion of it available at a web site somewhere? Am I right in
>assuming that this list does *not* want to consume even more bandwidth fielding
>queries about done deals than it already has on procedural rules?

I think we need an XML public discussion list, at least for a while. I
think this has worked well for the TEI. I'm not sure when such a thing
should start though. Once it has, every piece of XML literature needs to
have the address blazoned on it though.

That Q&A from the conference was excellent and should certainly be on the web.

This list is not the place.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I've dropped comp.text.sgml, except
for occasional peeks every few months or so.

   -- David

I am not a number. I am an undefined character.
_________________________________________
David Durand              dgd@cs.bu.edu  \  david@dynamicDiagrams.com
Boston University Computer Science        \  Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/   \  Dynamic Diagrams
--------------------------------------------\  http://dynamicDiagrams.com/
MAPA: mapping for the WWW                    \__________________________