Re: Multi-headed indirect links

>> At least within the ERB, the general design approach
>> appears to be remarkably uncontroversial.
>It's a pity that doesn't become more apparent to the list members who 
>are not members of the ERB.  A more open process is wanted and needed.

I agree at least partly with this sentiment. One reason for a limited
WG mailing list is to avoid the noise caused by ignorance (ie. let's
not repeat HTML-WG). 

I think both Len and I remember the VRML-VAG....

Follow-Ups: References: