Re: Multi-headed indirect links
At 09:03 AM 1/21/97 -0600, Len Bullard wrote:
>W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
>> This is simply not in any way true. The ERB is well under way in adapting
>> my stickman proposal into a formal first draft of the XML Link discussion.
>You could have fooled me. All we see on the list is the squabble,
>not the work underway, which I suppose we all sanction once
>presented. Not a good way to run a list, Eliot. Not at all.
This work only started as of last Wednesday's meeting, following the
holiday hiatus when the ERB could not meet. I don't know what the editors'
schedule is, but I would expect to see a draft pretty soon.
My proposal has been out and available for a couple of weeks now, yet
there's been very little direct comment it on it here in this list, which
surprises me. I expected to see either a counter proposal or some comment
on the proposal itself. Given that this was a proposal by a member of the
ERB and that, in the absence of any other proposal it would almost
certainly be taken as the base for any ERB-defined design, I don't see how
the process could be any more open at this point.
W. Eliot Kimber (email@example.com)
Senior SGML Consulting Engineer, Highland Consulting
2200 North Lamar Street, Suite 230, Dallas, Texas 75202
+1-214-953-0004 +1-214-953-3152 fax
http://www.isogen.com (work) http://www.drmacro.com (home)
"Rats in the morning, rats in the afternoon...if they don't go away, I'll be
re-educated soon..." --Austin Lounge Lizards, "1984 Blues"