Re: Multi-headed indirect links
Martin Bryan wrote:
> Given that nobody other than myself seems to be interested in indirect
> links, and that for direct links the only form that is getting any support
> is that of an opaque string, I ask myself whether the XML community has any
> interest in having multiheaded links?
I thought everyone was interested in multiheaded links (if I understand
that correctly). What I notice is that no design has emerged from
the discussion. I see the same standoff that has existed between
HyTime and TEI proponents for a number of years now.
Given the schedule set forth, this is disappointing.